Comments on: Oxenhielm discussion and press release http://www.gustavholmberg.com/magnitude/2003/12/13/oxenhielm-discussion-and-press-release/ Fri, 16 May 2008 20:57:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Leon Marcel http://www.gustavholmberg.com/magnitude/2003/12/13/oxenhielm-discussion-and-press-release/#comment-1509 Leon Marcel Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:27:53 +0000 http://www.gustavholmberg.com/magnitude/2003/12/13/oxenhielm-discussion-and-press-release/#comment-1509 Really good work. I found a lot of profound information which can help me to go on. Thanks for all this input. Really good work. I found a lot of profound information which can help me to go on. Thanks for all this input.

]]> By: Joe Kauzlarich http://www.gustavholmberg.com/magnitude/2003/12/13/oxenhielm-discussion-and-press-release/#comment-1508 Joe Kauzlarich Wed, 24 Dec 2003 22:45:52 +0000 http://www.gustavholmberg.com/magnitude/2003/12/13/oxenhielm-discussion-and-press-release/#comment-1508 Hi, I wrote the stories on Mathforge.net and was also curious to see this press release. However, my figuring is that the press release was a tad precocious on the part of Oxenhielm, judging by Zhou's comments. You might check out my follow-up story on the front page of http://www.mathforge.net for some further discussion. I'm most interested in seeing what happens to the journal which published Oxenhielm's paper. I believe they are the ones most responsible for Oxenhielm's potential defamation of character, assuming the proof was in fact very obviously flawed. Hi, I wrote the stories on Mathforge.net and was also curious to see this press release. However, my figuring is that the press release was a tad precocious on the part of Oxenhielm, judging by Zhou’s comments. You might check out my follow-up story on the front page of http://www.mathforge.net for some further discussion.

I’m most interested in seeing what happens to the journal which published Oxenhielm’s paper. I believe they are the ones most responsible for Oxenhielm’s potential defamation of character, assuming the proof was in fact very obviously flawed.

]]> By: Off the Kuff http://www.gustavholmberg.com/magnitude/2003/12/13/oxenhielm-discussion-and-press-release/#comment-1515 Off the Kuff Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:49:22 +0000 http://www.gustavholmberg.com/magnitude/2003/12/13/oxenhielm-discussion-and-press-release/#comment-1515 <strong>Hilbert redux</strong> For the math geeks in my audience (and you know who you are), there's some followup to this post about... Hilbert redux

For the math geeks in my audience (and you know who you are), there’s some followup to this post about…

]]>